Entries Tagged as ''

Facebook, We Meet Again

When I posted “Ancestral Space: Social Media for Genealogists” a few days ago, I got a couple of interesting comments.  This really is a hot topic these days.

John suggested that Facebook is a medium to make contact with those who are “on the fringe of being interested [in genealogy] and don’t know much of anything”.  True, it would also be a nice way of meeting a large number of possible relatives with information on what happened to whom.

Thomas MacEntee of Destination: Austin Family said that “Facebook is good to see what your peers are up to”. True, but you have to be friends with everyone to do that and I just feel weird asking to be someone’s friend when they don’t know me.  Junior High anyone?  Oh, and Thomas?  I’ll be tapping you on the shoulder here shortly.

But apparently I’m not the only one having problems getting acclimated.  Tim summed it up very nicely with “I’m on Facebook, So Now What?” on Genealogy Reviews Online.  He said “so far I haven’t found any useful angle for me”.  I couldn’t agree more but I’m giving it another whirl.  So I spiffed up my Facebook profile, brought in some posts from my blog, joined some groups and even created a new group.  And I’ve offered a bounty to anyone who can get a good picture of me to upload.  So far, no takers.  And I even picked up a few friends by participating in an experiment of sorts at a popular blog on blogging.  I may regret that one.

Question is, will all this do me any good?  Looks like it won’t be anytime soon because the We’re Related application is not working.  Apparently the 109,000 daily users (up from 97,000 just two weeks ago) are taxing the system a bit.  Tim must have been right when he said that “there’s been a mad rush of genealogists” to Facebook.  I may just be forced to get over my shyness after all.

Now what is this Circle of Trust?  I missed that.

Well, He’s Not Daniel Boone but I Guess He’ll Do

When I was a little girl, my favorite books were juvenile biographies of female historical figures like Abigail Adams, Nancy Hanks and Rebecca Boone, one that I especially enjoyed.  I was totally in awe of Daniel Boone, at least the Fess Parker version and when I realized that the Boones actually had about a dozen children and not just the two that were depicted on the TV show, I would fantasize about discovering I was one of their long lost great-great grandchildren.  Of course, that didn’t turn out to be the case but I did find out that I was very distantly related by marriage to a similar American icon.  Well, he never had his own TV show that I know of but he did appear in one or two movies.

Now follow me if you can - I’ve mentioned my great grandfather, James Eiland, a few times.  His grandfather, Enoch Eiland, is believed by most researchers (myself not included, but that’s another post) to be the son of Absalom Eiland.  Absalom had another son named Asa Absalom Eiland.  Asa married a lady named Virginia Moffett, daughter of Henry and Margaret Moffett.  Virginia’s sister, Nancy Moffett, married Temple Lea.  Temple and Nancy Moffett Lea had a daughter named Margaret Moffett Lea, who was the third and last wife of General Sam Houston.  So that means that James Eiland’s great Uncle Asa Eiland was also the uncle of Sam Houston’s wife, Margaret.

And that would be my one and only famous relative.  (Of course, it could all be hearsay or wishful thinking.)

PaperPort 10, Genealogical Scanning Project, Part 5

I wasn’t anticipating a Part 5 but I thought I would post an update on my Genealogical Scanning Project using PaperPort 10.  I haven’t had much time to work on the project but I have run into a couple of issues I thought I would share.  Unfortunately, it has taken 119 documents to discover them.

  • The software does not switch easily between letter and legal sized documents.  You have the option the make the change but sometimes it is grayed out for no apparent reason.  If it is not grayed out and you are able to change the setting, the software still scans the document in at the previous setting.  The only way I have found to fix this is to close the program and reopen it.  Clearly, this is not making me happy.
  • When you close the program and reopen it, sometimes the default settings reload, sometimes they don’t.
  • I really wish there was some sort of auto numbering system as you scan in the documents.
  • It’s hard to tell if the program is scanning the document in the correct size until it is complete.  If you have a 7 page document, it can be a little frustrating.
  • You cannot adjust the lighter or darker scale as it is grayed out.  I didn’t realize I had so many dim copies from old books that had been poorly printed to begin with.  I hesitate to try to scan them at all.  However, I could recopy them on a copy machine using a darker setting and then scan.

These things can really be worked around without a lot of difficulty and I am so far into the project that I really couldn’t see changing gears at this point.

Now if I could just find that little snippet I remember reading about Sam Houston’s great niece.  Where did it go?

ScanSoft PaperPort 11 is available at Amazon.com!

Preserving a Family Heirloom

I don’t have a whole lot that has been passed down through the generations of my family.  Most of the really old things I have, I received by means other than “hand me downs”.

I have the handwritten marriage licenses of two of my Hadley forebears.  Both were issued by the Republic of Texas, one in 1841 and the other in 1844.  They are in amazing condition.  The courthouse just mailed them to me.  Seems Joshua and Denny never went back to the courthouse to pick them up after they had been recorded in the proper books.  Thanks guys!

I have the Eiland photograph I discussed a couple days ago.  I dated it back to October 1898.  That makes it 108 years old and it, too, is in great condition.

I also have a small piece of paper that my great grandmother, Lizzie Martin, used to write down her recipe for sugar cookies.  It seems insignificant but it is all I have of her.  It is one of just a few things passed down to me and I want to display it in some form or fashion.  Naturally, it should be framed but I was wondering if anyone would have any suggestions that would make it seem really special when displayed.  Is there someone you know who specializes in showcasing a family heirloom?  Someone you have trusted in the past?  Anyone I need to stay away from?  Your thoughts are greatly appreciated.

Disproving a DAR Patriot: Jacob Hollingsworth

Or …How to Make Enemies in North Carolina.

Early in 2000 I was working on a set of supplemental papers for DAR. For non-genealogists, that means I was trying to prove descent from an American patriot other than the one I “used” to join DAR.  I based my research on a set of papers submitted and approved in 1992 for an ancestor named Jacob Hollingsworth.  My lineage tied into Generation 6 of the other member’s lineage, although through a different spouse.  According to the application papers:

  • Jacob Hollingsworth, the patriot, was born c. 1741 in Chester County, PA and died c. 1823 in Franklin County, GA.  He was married to Mary Brooks.
  • Their son, Samuel, was born c. 1770 in NC and died May 15, 1815 in Franklin County, GA.  He was married to Mary Barner.
  • Their son, John, was born September 3, 1792 in Franklin County, GA and died November 30, 1880 at Ford’s Mountain, AL.  He married Matilda White.  (I am descended from his second wife, Zilpha Galloway, who was not mentioned in these papers.)
  • “Descendants of Valentine Hollingsworth” was cited as a source although some dates were a bit off.  Another member’s papers were also cited.
  • His service was proven by an Application for Pension dated November 5, 1838 found in the Pennsylvania Archives.

Now as I began to complete my papers for this ancestor I noticed that some things did not quite add up.  If Jacob died in 1823 in Georgia, how did he file for a pension in 1838?  Perhaps his widow filed?  Better check it out, so I ordered a copy of the pension papers.

When the papers arrived I discovered that they were filed by the veteran in 1838 while he was living in Chilton, Anderson County, TN.  In fact, the Jacob who filed for a pension in 1838 was rejected because he did not have an actual discharge paper.  He claimed it was signed by George Washington himself but had been lost at some point along with his wallet.  So his service was still questionable and the 1992 application should not have been accepted to begin with.  Regardless of that oversight, this was clearly not the Jacob Hollingsworth that had already died in Georgia in 1823.  Further research in The Hollingsworth Register (October 1965, Volume I, No. 3, page 112-113) revealed that the Jacob living in Tennessee was the son of Jacob and Elizabeth (Chandler) Hollingsworth.  Our Jacob in Georgia, according to the Descendants of Valentine Hollingsworth was the son of Samuel and Barbara (Shewin) Hollingsworth.  One name, two men.  At this point, neither qualifies as a DAR Patriot.  (This reminds me of a lecture I once attended entitled “Hugh Montgomery: Two Men with the Same Name, or One Man with a Fast Horse” by Jo White Linn.)

The lineage from Jacob of Georgia was correct but the service was disproved and my supplemental was in jeopardy, not to mention the original membership papers of another member.  I was on thin ice but all I had to do was find proof of service for the correct Jacob - if it existed.

Both Jacobs, descendants of Valentine Hollingsworth, were born into a Quaker family and as members in good standing, were not allowed to bear arms against an enemy soldier or take oaths of any kind.  So this gives weight to a belief that no service, military or otherwise, may be found for our Jacob.  Granted, some descendants took up arms and were disowned by the church but others did not.

The Tennessee Jacob arrived there via South Carolina.  Our Jacob arrived in Georgia by way of North Carolina.  He was found on the Randolph County, NC Tax List of 1779 as evidenced by The North Carolinian, June 1956, Volume II, No. 6, page 182.  Everyone who paid a tax was required to take the Oath of Allegiance, something a Quaker could not do.  Jacob refused, indicating that he was still a practicing Quaker and therefore, never served in the miltary or in public office.  To back this up, no pension applications bearing his name have been discovered.  Furthermore, Jacob received no bounty land for service.  So not only has the service been disproved but the other member’s entire application has been disqualified unless we can find proof that Jacob gave aid in the form of money or goods.  Should I report my findings to DAR?

I agonized over this for some time.  I had visions of death threats from the other member and her chapter.  In the end, I could not let the incorrect information linger on for eternity, unchecked by future applicants.  I wrote a letter and presented my findings to the Corrections Genealogist at the DAR National Headquarters.  It took one year to get a response but they agreed with me and the ancestor was removed from the Patriot Index.  I assume they found no proof of material aid either.  I’m sure they assisted the other member in locating another ancestor to support her membership.  I hope she wasn’t too upset with me.